I recently participated in a
Discussion on “Sales Metrics vs. Sales Coaching”. The author of the article (http://ow.ly/bNcH3) makes a good point – keep sales people
focused on a few things that they can perform at really well. Don’t confuse them with too many
variables. Use their good behavior to
coach others. The following is my
contribution to this Discussion, with later enhancements.
The topic is really “Sales
Metrics and Sales Coaching”, not “vs.”!
Metrics and Coaching go together.
To paraphrase my great Italian friend Mike “one without the other is
like a day without wine!” Yes, most
sales people when overwhelmed with too many measures simply self-select the
ones they like and ignore the rest. It
is the responsibility of sales management to minimize this ambiguity. Sales management must set the context within
which their sales people can focus on a few key things and be wildly successful. Ongoing, sales management would monitor what
is going on both overall and with specific agreed upon measures. Using insights from these metrics they would coach
their sales people to greater success.
To keep this post a quick
read it is focused on metrics. Coaching,
based on metrics, is another significant topic and deserves its own focused
discussion. For this post the scope of coaching
includes results, behavioral topics, and out-of-the-box thinking on deal
strategy.
In examining which metrics
to use to track and to understand performance, it helps to examine the following
general sales business process areas:
- Opportunity Management
- Lead Generation
- Territory Management/Account Management
In addition to these process
areas, sales management should include certain Expected Behaviors. All of these are elaborated upon below.
Opportunity Management:
To simplify this discussion
think of the Opportunity Management process as the flow through a pipeline – leads
go into the pipeline (AKA Sales Funnel) and the outputs are hopefully wins, but
also includes losses, cancelled deals, or opportunities that are not yet ready
and should be turned back into leads.
Life is better when the ratio of Leads to Wins is closer to 1-to-1!
The company’s Opportunity Management process determines what happens inside the pipeline in taking the input (lead) and producing the desired output (win). In general, sales management could examine several performance metrics throughout this process. Having done so, they are positioned with the insights to coach their sales people to take actions that will correct or enhance desired pipeline performance. Hence, “Sales Metrics and Sales Coaching “!
Life is better when the ratio of Leads to Wins is closer to 1-to-1!
The company’s Opportunity Management process determines what happens inside the pipeline in taking the input (lead) and producing the desired output (win). In general, sales management could examine several performance metrics throughout this process. Having done so, they are positioned with the insights to coach their sales people to take actions that will correct or enhance desired pipeline performance. Hence, “Sales Metrics and Sales Coaching “!
The pipeline is rich with
opportunities for metrics and measures, and reflects the business context. As noted above, a common mistake is to get
carried away with too many formal sales person tracking metrics. Following is an overview of good candidate
metrics:
- The output end – examples include:
- Are win results meeting expectations, consistently over time?
- What is the yield from the pipeline (i.e., that ratio of Leads to Wins)?
- The actions within the pipeline are an important leading indicator to successful output, and provide great insights for sales manager coaching. Two good examples include:
- Velocity of opportunities through the company’s identified Stages of sales person’s pipeline. Having lots of deals in various Stages is good unless they have been sitting for much longer than sales management’s expectations for a healthy deal velocity. This results in a bloated pipeline! Giving a false sense of well-being, but very misleading to all!
- Appropriate balance of opportunities at each Stage within the pipeline that will produce a consistent stream of wins over time. Does the sales person have enough healthy deals in his/her pipeline to produce results needed to consistently meet targets? For example, if the sales person is only focused on a few deals at the closing Stages of pipeline then they are likely to face a “dry spell” in the near future (i.e., the pig-in-python effect).
Lead Generation:
Nothing happens unless an
adequate number of leads enter the pipeline. Understanding the number of leads
entering the pipeline is a key metric. BTW:
marketing people will likely want Sales to track the source of such leads. Lead
generation is a big effort, and some think one that requires a different skill
set than most average high performing sales persons. Many organizations utilize an inside sales
center (or outsourced) to generate leads that are qualified and then turned
over to the field sales person to confirm and work as a qualified
opportunity. If so, sales management may
want to measure the number of leads generated by same and passed to field sales,
the number rejected by field sales, and the number that result in a win. (BTW – do you know how many Leads you need
entering your Pipeline/Funnel in order to have the expected number of
Wins? Many underestimate this
multiple! See my earlier Blog entry on
this topic http://salesopseffectiveness.blogspot.com/2011/05/great-debate-how-big-should-your-funnel.html).
Territory Management / Account Management:
This is where sales
management has the opportunity to set the context for the sales person’s
focus. Just tossing a sales person into
a general geography may be too ambiguous.
If sales management wants to penetrate several new industries, why not
dedicate each sales person to one or two industries? If sales management wants to sell a broad
range of products/services, don’t burden each sales person with everything,
particularly if the buyer level or sales approach is significantly different for
each product/service. If sales
management wants to incent performance for a specific product/service, why not
place a bonus on sale of same? The
outcome of this thinking is sales people are generally assigned one or more
solutions (products/services) to sell into a focused territory. Over time sales management would then inspect
whether the sales person has assessed their territory and set a priority for
accounts where they expect to find and close opportunities. In other words, does the sales person have a
plan for where their business will be generated? In many cases sales people are assigned one
or a few large accounts as their territory.
For these people having an agreed upon account plan for each is key to
success. These two points are key areas
for coaching. Getting the sales person
focused within their territory/account(s) can reduce flail and keep their
pipelines charged with good viable opportunities.
Expected Behaviors:
The above metrics reflect actions
as consequence of following the company’s prescribed sales business
processes. In addition to these metrics,
sales management should also inspect whether the sale person is behaving the
way they expect. Non-compliant behavior
can seriously erode the effectiveness of business processes and sales
success. These are “softer” metrics, but
can lead to effective “coaching moments”.
The following are typical questions that sales management should ask: Is the sales person following the sales
process that the company has prescribed?
Is the sales person interacting with client/prospect in way that the sale
manager expects (i.e., make some joint calls)?
Is the sale person focused or does she/he “chase every rabbit that
crosses the road”? Hopefully coaching
aligns expected sales person behavior. In
persistent non-compliance situations, sale management should identify
appropriate formal measurements for improvement.
In summary, all of the above
metric areas can break down to many specific measures. Too many with which to burden an individual
sales person! Sales management should analyze
the universe of these to understand what is happening within their business. Dashboards with drill downs are great
vehicles to enable such analysis! Having
gained insights from this analysis the sales manager would select specific key agreed
upon metrics and measures for focused coaching with their sales people. These areas may change over time as various
parts of the business process performance improves or weakens. So – the entire metrics performance dashboard
is for “Captain Kirk”, each sales person gets a dashboard with a few specific
dials, and both are in sync with the readings, with Captain Kirk coaching as
required!
…and all will live long and prosper!!
Sales coaching is used to identify an employee’s strengths and weaknesses. Once those strengths and weaknesses are identified, the employee can then be trained to change the areas that need some work. Thanks.
ReplyDeleteSales Training Melbourne
Ashlynn, thank you for your Comment. I take a slightly different view of Coaching. To me Coaching is all about the Sales Manager assisting the Sales Person to achieve a higher level of sales performance. This is done on a deal by deal basis and within the context of the sales process that the organization has implemented. It is based on a real opportunity; the Sales Manager Coaches the Sales Person on best actions to achieve the next outcome.
DeleteI do agree with you that a by-product of this process will be the surfacing of each Sales Person's strengths and weaknesses. From these the Sales Manager will likely ask Sales Person to take some follow up or remedial training. BTW: in a perfect Implementation of CRM this initial assessment may be done as part of roll-out planning, giving the individal Sales Person a road-map of training to prepare them to be more effective. On-going it is the Sales Manager's role to Coach the Sales People and recommend further training based on observations during Coaching (or perhaps do some career counseling!).